anatomy

ramasoeu project has no title or page numbers. not an entirely bad submission latent with potential if project was pushed further. formatting needs to be consistent, especially with font and font size. some pages are hand written other typed. why? page orientation needs to be consistent throughout document. if its landscape then its should be landscape – do not mix landscape + portrait pages. on movement, the circle depicting distances: is the diameter the distance or the radius? this is confusing. use a circle template with a consistent center point. document suffers from coherency + a lack of crispness. 4.7/10 skhotha project has no title or page numbers. project is difficult to access, with very confusing legend and use of colour. 3.5/10 nyilenda an interesting submission with suffers from a lack of time + effort invested in it. the various page heading could have been richer and more layers could have enhanced the document. as much as the context snapshots page is appreciated, a text layer would have been helpful. some captions would have made the pager much more loaded. over reliant on the building footprint map, a base map would have helped. page numbers? 5/10 manyaka document has no title page or page numbers. north point on the vrededorp arial [what is that?] map is incorrect. public transport network is confusing. what are general roads? document is somewhat tardy with cryptic headings and sentences. 4.1/10 mkhulisa project has no title or page numbers. inconsistent page orientation makes it difficult to access the document. 3/10 james document has no title page or page numbers. project is peppered with spell mistakes and the maps are hard to access. the legends are legible making the maps even less readable. requires more commitment to make it an accessible project. 3/10 no name document has no title page or page numbers. 5.7/10 quarm document has a cover page, contents page + page number. well done. a well thought through and put together document only marred by a lack of conclusion. 7.3/10 anaman document has a cover page, contents page + page number. well done. a very good beginning with a terrible aerial view image on page 4. very pixelated. captions would have enhanced the document on the land uses, page 9. keep the font size consistent and try always to use your own photographs instead on relying of google earth images. this, unfortunately, removes something from the project. 7.3/10 kara document has no title page or page numbers. the project has a sense of spirit which should continue throughout the semester. there is a certain clarity within the project. a photographic + text layer would have enhanced the project. 6/10